Palmyra Sportsmens Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237429888
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
Location
Annville, PA, USA
Phone
7178320488
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$792,858
Expenses
$635,127
Assets
$1,616,087
Liabilities
$5,796

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEFF LUTZ (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • RODRICK BEYERLE (SECRETARY): $7,620 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the palmyra sportsmen's association is to provide activities that provides training and education for our members and non-members, in the shooting and fishing sports. Our participants are juniors and adults in all disciplines of the shooting sports. We specifically conduct hunter - trapper education, civilian marksmanship programs, youth programs for small-bore rifle & air rifle, daisy bb gun, junior olympic archery, youth educational archery, and youth trapshooting through tdap (trapshooting development assn. Of pa). Approximately 500 youth. We also have an annual family field day with an attendance of 1,000 people from the local communities participating in many shooting activities and educational programs. We are also a USA north east regional junior training center for small-bore & air rifle. We provide an exclusive range for local borough and township police departments to train and qualify so they can maintain their employment and provide their communities with the

What it reported doing in 2025

Youth programs: small bore, air rifle, b-b gun, junior olympic archery development (j.o.a.d.), youth educational archery program, youth trapshooting program (associated with t.d.a.p.), youth air pistol program. Psa provides all of the following for all the youth programs: equipment, instruction, supplies (consumables), travel expenses (if needed), and facilities. In the small bore program psa hosts the ncaa college matches which are the largest in the country. The airrifle program and small bore are for youth from 12 to 18 years of age. Psa facility is designed the USA's northeast regional training facility. The program provides instruction, marksmanship, state competition, international competition.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.1%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 93.3%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19.9%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.54; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.1% of revenue deployed · 93.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $592K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $8K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.