Palmetto Partners For
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201756491
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Pendleton, SC, USA
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $212,162
- Expenses
- $182,792
- Assets
- $477,130
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- FRANK MOBLEY (PRESIDENT OF IMMEDIATION)
- JOHN BARNES (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
- GREG HUMPHREY (PRESIDENT PALMETTO NET)
- KRIS BUSCH (VICE PRESIDENT BAE SYSTEMS)
- CASEY WELCH (PRESIDENT OF STEM PREMIER)
People named in this filing
- JAMES COUCH (CHAIRMAN)
- FRANK MOBLEY (PRESIDENT OF IMMEDIATION)
- CAMILLA HERTWIG (SECRETARY TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Educational stem and ai
What it reported doing in 2025
State and regional robotic championships for vex and first. Students build robots and teams of students must program the robots to accomplish tasks in a timed event. First championship largest expense is the convention center. All students in sc are eligible grants to schools to buy robotic kits and fields for competition. Robotics from elementary through higfh school. Vwx robotics has grown 22 percent over the previous year. We started the program in sc and continue to grow the program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 6
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 99.8%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.8%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.61; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 51.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86% of revenue deployed · 99.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $183K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.