Palm Creek Wood Workers Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
850960524
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Casa Grande, AZ, USA
Phone
5205537217
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$45,603
Expenses
$14,640
Assets
$116,045
Liabilities
$1,834

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Paul Wallace (President, Director)
  • Steve Alexander (Vice President, Director)

People named in this filing

  • Paul Wallace (President, Director)
  • Steve Alexander (Vice President, Director)
  • Roger Salter (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization provides training, support and equipment to its members. Member are hobbyist woodworkers of all skill levels whose interaction allows members to share knowledge of woodworking and improve their skills. During the year ended 10/31/2023, the organization served approximately 342 members.

What it reported doing in 2022

The organization provides training, support, supplies and equipment to its members. Members are hobbyist woodworkers of all skill levels whose interaction allows members to share knowledge of woodworking and improve their skills. During the year ended 10/31/2022, the organization served approximately 360 members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 63% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 67.9%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.93; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -34% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 55.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2020 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.