Palm Beach County Film & Television

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
861126753
IRS 990 coverage
2007–2007
Forms available
Form 990 2007
Location
West Palm Beach, FL, USA
Phone
5612331000
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Arts, Culture, and Humanities

Reported finances

Revenue
$66,633
Expenses
$165,929

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2007. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • BILL METZGER (DIRECTOR & CHAIR)
  • jonATHAN GREENE (DIRECTOR)
  • johN OXENDINE (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2007. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote education in palm beach county and nationally by providing both financial support and professional volunteers to produce and distribute educational programs while also developing practical skills and careers for students by providing opportunities to attain experience in the development, production and distribution of professional film, television and related media.

What it reported doing in 2007

The living history series - development of a compilation of documentary video productions designed to tell the story of the establishment and growth of palm beach, one of the best known places worldwide, through personal histories of long-time residents and decendants of its founding families; part of the centennial celebration in 2011.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 32
  • Accountability: 6
  • Sustainability: NotEnoughData
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 66.7%; rating input score 67
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: Limited
  • Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Missing
    • Document-retention policy: Missing
    • CEO compensation review process: Limited
    • Other executive compensation review process: Limited
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Missing
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Missing
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Missing

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 1 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 9 filed program accomplishments · $143K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series revenue component sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.