Pali Quarterback Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 452544633
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2014–2024
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2024
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA, USA
Phone: 3105579200
Rating: 69
Verdict: SUPPORTED
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue: $94,167
Expenses: $66,727
Assets: $215,066

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

CORIANNE BRIGHT (President)

People named in this filing

ELILA WONG-PIZANTE (CFO)
CORIANNE BRIGHT (President)
STEWART WILSON TURNER (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the pali quarterback club is to provide support, enthusiasm andopportunities on and off the field to the players and coaching staff of palisadescharter high school, a public school. We are also dedicated to promoting pali highfootball throughout the public school's community. We sponsor events and raisefunds for the expenses not covered by the athletic budget of this public school.

What it reported doing in 2024

We sponsor events and raise funds for the expenses not covered bythe athletic budget.

Operating model

Revenue model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 60
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 67
Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 52.4%; rating input score 52
Program expense ratio: 74%; rating input score 74

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: 29.1%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.22; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: -6.3% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 20.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 52.4% of revenue deployed · 74% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $49K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
Schedules: 3 filed schedules
Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.