Pakistani Community Church of USA
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813389274
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Rodeo, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5104213478
- Rating
- 56
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $184,656
- Expenses
- $184,800
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SAMUEL ERIC (CEO)
People named in this filing
- SAMUEL ERIC (CEO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The churchs primary exempt purpose is to advance religious worship and spiritual development in accordance with Christian principles. The organization conducts regular worship services, prayer meetings, Bible study, and religious education for children, youth, and adults. The church provides pastoral care, counseling, and community outreach, including charitable support for individuals and families in need. The organization is also working toward establishing and constructing a permanent church facility to better serve its congregation and expand religious programs, fellowship, and community service activities.
What it reported doing in 2025
Worship Services and Spiritual Activities The church conducts weekly worship services, prayer meetings, and special religious gatherings to support the spiritual growth of its congregation. These services include preaching, music ministry, fellowship, and pastoral guidance. Approximately 80100 individuals attend services regularly and benefit from spiritual teaching, encouragement, and community support.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 37
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 37.2%; rating input score 37
- Program expense ratio: 37.2%; rating input score 37
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.1%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 35.2% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.8% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 37.2% of revenue deployed · 37.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $69K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.