Pahcs Ii

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
363887234
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2020
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Phone
3129269495
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$789
Assets
$52,814
Liabilities
$5,501,500

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Pahcs ii exists to meet the occupational health-related needs of area employers by providing innovative solutions that address regulatory, health and safety issues of their workforce.

What it reported doing in 2020

PAHCS II PROVIDED HEALTHCARE AND SAFETY-RELATED SERVICES TO PEOPLE IN THE WORKPLACE. IN JULY, 2018 THESE SERVICES WERE DISCONTINUED. During the tax year ended August 31, 2021, the organization collected outstanding receivables and settled payables as it evaluated future plans.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 66
  • Accountability: 37
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 66.94; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 104.17; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 66,306%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -35.6% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -12.1% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.6M · 3 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2009 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 34 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.