Paddy Reilly Memorial Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813705658
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9175726886
- Rating
- 43
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $73,626
- Expenses
- $6,923
- Assets
- $98,630
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANGELA REILLY (PRESIDENT)
- KATHLEEN REILLY-MCCRINK (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ANGELA REILLY (PRESIDENT)
- THOMAS O'REILLY (TREASURER)
- KATHLEEN REILLY-MCCRINK (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The paddy reilly memorial foundation, inc. Is dedicated to aid poor, underprivileged, and distressed youth and adults who are in need of medicare, educational opportunities and recreational opportunities by paying for medical care, paying for educational opportunities (including tuition reimbursements) and sponsoring recreational opportunities.
What it reported doing in 2024
The paddy reilly memorial foundation, inc. Made grants to two charitable organizations during 2024. See statement o for grants details.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 95% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 6
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 89
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 1.3%; rating input score 1
- Program expense ratio: 13.3%; rating input score 13
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 90.6%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 14.25; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -33% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 1.3% of revenue deployed · 13.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $923 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.