Pacific Palisades Task Force on Homelessness
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813068146
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Pacific Palisades, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3105692388
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Philanthropy, Charity, Voluntarism Promotion
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $382,386
- Expenses
- $124,675
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Sharon M Browning (Co President)
- Sharon Kilbride (Co President)
People named in this filing
- Sharon M Browning (Co President)
- Sharon Kilbride (Co President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
PPTFH provides leadership and resources to address the destructive consequences of homelessness so that the community is protected and our homeless individuals receive compassionate services and access to permanent supportive housing.
What it reported doing in 2022
PPTFH contracted with The People Concern to provide clinical case workers and other trained field personnel to interface with homeless individuals encountered within Pacific Palisades. A number of homeless individuals were successfully place in interim and permanent supportive housing.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 25.7%; rating input score 26
- Program expense ratio: 78.8%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $720.12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 67.4%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 22.5% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 25.7% of revenue deployed · 78.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $98K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2018 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 26/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.