Pacific Northwest District of Key Club International Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843485841
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Astoria, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5033252200
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Community Service Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $884,604
- Expenses
- $828,874
- Assets
- $1,305,526
- Liabilities
- $464,183
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRIAN EGGER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- BRIAN EGGER (PRESIDENT)
- MIKE WALLIS (SECRETARY/TREASURER)
- CRIENA SEKHON (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization provides programs designed to educate young people in business matters and train them for leadership roles, interpersonal skills, public speaking and personal responsibility. The organization further promotes the objects of key club international, student leadership and community service, provides resources and assistance for coordination of the projects of its member clubs, strengthens and extends the key club program, increases the cooperation between the district efforts and the clubs within the district by providing educational resources, promotes the participation of its high school member clubs within the district in the objectives, programs and policies of the district and key club international, and also promotes kiwanis family relations.
What it reported doing in 2024
Student leadership, growth and education - pacific northwest district board of trustee meeting seminars & development of kiwanis family and educational, training and resource materials to member high school clubs within the district. The organization holds four (4) annual meetings of its student pacific northwest district of key club international district board of trustees. Each meeting is held over the course of a weekend that is pre-determined by the student leadership team. The organization's meetings and times are usually held according to the following schedule: spring - held annually in may summer - held annually in august fall - held annually in november winter - held annually in februaryeach of the student pacific northwest district of key club international district board of trustee meetings provide the student lieutenant governors and committee chairs a forum to discuss their progress in fulfilling their officer responsibilities throughout their terms in office. They also provide an opportunity for these student officers to discuss additional resources they can bring to the member key clubs they serve to help them with accomplishing their service related goals. Topics discussed during these meetings usually include the organization's district project, upcoming educational conferences, preparation and promotion of the annual district convention, and requirements for elected new student lieutenant governors and club officers each spring. Additionally, there are opportunities for each student leader to share best practices related to service projects, membership growth, and fundraising with their peers. These opportunities further advance the organization's goals. These meetings also provide the ability for the adult kiwanis committee to interact with their student leaders to further build and strengthen their communications and interactions with our kiwanis-family organization. There are also educational sessions that are facilitated by external speakers which help develop each student leader's professional character including public speaking and post-secondary goals such as applying for college admission. These meetings also help student leaders further promote service leadership skills and educational resources to the member key clubs in the divisions they serve as members of the pacific northwest district student board of trustees. Additionally, throughout the year, the pacific northwest district student board of trustees develop various educational, training and resource materials for its high school member clubs. Development of these materials require the district committees to meet outside of the scheduled board meetings.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.7%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 98.5%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 76.8%; rating input score 77; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.3%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.58; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 34.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 32.4% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 29.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.7% of revenue deployed · 98.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 8 filed program accomplishments · $816K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.