Pacific Northwest Animal Nutrition Conference Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883954544
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Champaign, IL, USA
- Phone
- 2173563182
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies & Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $103,000
- Expenses
- $91,702
- Assets
- $160,436
- Liabilities
- $76,318
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
People named in this filing
- DONALD A LLEWELLYN (DIRECTOR)
- CORY T PARSONS (DIRECTOR)
- JAMES L SULLIVAN (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To conduct an annual conference for nutritionists, farmers, veterinarians, and other livestock industry specialists and professionals with the purpose of educating individuals and entities working with farm animals to improve the health, productivity, and welfare of such farm animals and other sustainability, success, and progression of the farms that raise them. And to support a graduate student research poster competition to promote the education, networking, and success of future animal science professionals and/or researchers.
What it reported doing in 2024
The conference has been a source of research, knowledge and education to the university and industry regarding animal nutrition in the pacific nw. The conference is held in boise, Idaho every january. With the efforts of a planning committee from the university and industry sects in animal nutrition and veterinary sciences, the conference strives to provide a learning atmosphere and networking to all that are interested
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.1%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 75.3%; rating input score 75
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.75; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.48; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.1% of revenue deployed · 75.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $69K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.