Pacific Futbol Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272829912
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Victor, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2094790624
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Soccer
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $89,017
- Expenses
- $102,543
- Assets
- $38,765
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUSAN VAN NESS (Vice President)
- RYAN VENHUIZEN (President)
People named in this filing
- SUSAN VAN NESS (Vice President)
- RYAN VENHUIZEN (President)
- KIM VENHUIZEN (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To educate and train players, parents, and coaches through development, promotion, and administration of the game of soccer among youths and young adults, regardless of race, creed, or ability within the territory of pacific futbol club.
What it reported doing in 2025
Pacific futbol club had nine teams (7 boys and 2 girls), consisting of approiximately 150 players. The teams played at all levels and competed in tournaments in various areas of California, from fresno to sacramento, the bay area, lake tahoe, and the foothills. The maniacs team participated in the state cup. The pfc 07/08 boys team consists of 2 teams (orange and white). The orange team consists of more advanced players and reached premier status by the end of the season, qualifying as n1 competitive team. This orange team also played in the state cup and finished in the first round of 16 teams. The orange and white team also had players that were invited to play in an elite academy team, which played other elite academy teams, traveling 2 to 3 hours away, and placed 3rd. This elite academy team also went to Arizona in april 2026 and competed in a college showcase. There are 8 young men from the orange and white team that graduated from high school who have acquired a spot on college teams in san joaquin and sacramento areas.our 2 girls team played at different levels and for them it was more of just have fun, it was not about the winning, it was about improving skills and having fun. Most of the older teams have boys and girls that will feed into the local high schools.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 96.2%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -15.2%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $99K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.