Pacific Coast Ob & Gyn Society

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
911054171
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Corvallis, OR, USA
Phone
5417404004
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$300,357
Expenses
$267,008
Assets
$631,171
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • THOMAS GAYLORD MD (PRESIDENT-EL)
  • LORI MARSHALL (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • THOMAS GAYLORD MD (PRESIDENT-EL)
  • JODELL BOYLE (SECRETARY TR)
  • AARON CAUGHEY MD (EDITOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The pacific coast obstetrical and gynecological society carried out its exempt purpose through the continuing professional education of its members and guests in the field of obstetrics and gynecology.

What it reported doing in 2024

The society had the annual scientific meeting in maui Hawaii in september 2022. This was the first live, non-electronic meeting since 2019 and was well attended and there was excellent participation of all attendees. There were approximately 18 presentations including much original research and first-time presentation of their research. The society sponsored residents and post resident fellows representing the memorial physician programs including the lynch, adams, and kimball. There were 7 from the 2022 completion that were named the winners and they presented their research to the entire forum. Winners from 2020 and 2021 were invited to present in poster format and 15 attended, both for poster presentation and meeting participation. During the covid interval from 2020 to 2022, a major rewrite of the bylaws and standing rules was accomplished. They were made gender nuetral, more friendly to selecting new members and improved job descriptions of the officers. A new mission/vision statement reflecting the practice of ob/gyn in the 21st century was approved. These changes were presented both in writing 2 months before and during the business meeting they were read, voted upon, and passed. With the changing demographics of the society, a new committe waaseated to address new and old membership concerns. This will improve member recruitment and retention.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 67% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81.4%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 89.9%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.1%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.36; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 81.4% of revenue deployed · 89.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $240K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 20 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.