Pacific Cancer Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510548338
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Wailuku, HI, USA
Phone
8082427661
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$677,037
Expenses
$552,468
Assets
$403,064
Liabilities
$52,895

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BARRY HELLE (BOARD PRESIDENT)
  • DORIEN ROMANCHAK PA-C (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • A BENTON TURNER MSHA CMD RTRT RT (PAST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DEXTER JANET BORROWMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JENNY WORTH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • STACEY MONIZ (PAST EXEC DIRECTOR): $83,805 total reported compensation
  • JENNY WORTH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $7,500 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the pacific cancer foundation is to provide access, knowledge and support to all those affected by cancer in maui county. We do this by providing free support services to maui's cancer community.

What it reported doing in 2024

The goal of the pacific cancer foundation is to provide free support services to maui county's cancer community. We assist patients and their families by providing access, knowledge and support, which will be beneficial in dealing with their disease. Access: the foundation seeks to provide easy and effective access to services for cancer patients. The foundation provides transportation services so clients can access tests, treatment, second opinions and specialists. The foundation supports care that improves the quality of life for cancer patients. Knowledge: the foundation distills the vast amount of information available on cancer in order to provide manageable educational resources for patients, their families and healthcare providers wishing to know more about disease. The foundation generates public awareness as well as support and understanding of the needs of the cancer patients and their families. The foundation will serve as an advocate for patients and their families in order to ensure that they receive the utmost respect and dignity as they face the challenges of their disease. Support: the foundation identifies for the cancer patient and their families support groups and special events specific to their needs. The foundation provides a resource center that provides personal assistance for those desiring information on the disease.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 86
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 42.3%; rating input score 42
  • Program expense ratio: 51.9%; rating input score 52
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.4 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.4%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.5%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 42.3% of revenue deployed · 51.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $287K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $84K · 19 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 32/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.