Pa Caring for K-9s Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463109278
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- New Oxford, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7174791989
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $94,846
- Expenses
- $57,817
- Assets
- $270,744
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TONY FROCK (PRESIDENT/TR)
People named in this filing
- TONY FROCK (PRESIDENT/TR)
- BETHANY PETERS (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To rescue the abandoned, injured and homeless canines, primarily from high kill shelters or owner surrenders. Working with dedicated fosters and volunteers to rehabilitate and train each dog to ensure they are properly cared for by having them vaccinated and spayed or neutered. Finding them all loving homes, after carefully screening each one to be sure that they last a lifetime.
What it reported doing in 2024
To rescue the abandoned, injured and homeless canines, primarily from high kill shelters or owner surrenders. Working with dedicated fosters and volunteers to rehabilitate and train each dog to ensure they are properly cared for by having them vaccinated and spayed or neutered. Finding them all loving homes, after carefully screening each one to be sure that they last a lifetime. We rescued 191 dogs in 2024.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 87% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 49.3%; rating input score 49
- Program expense ratio: 81.1%; rating input score 81
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.68; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -8.9% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9.3% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 49.3% of revenue deployed · 81.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $47K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.