P4 Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472196503
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Buford, GA, USA
Rating
50
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$145,869
Expenses
$125,507
Assets
$23,146

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Toni-Ann Vizzi (Vice President)
  • Gino Vizzi (Executive Director)
  • David Vizzi (President)

People named in this filing

  • Anthony Messuri (Treasurer Secretary)
  • Toni-Ann Vizzi (Vice President)
  • Gino Vizzi (Executive Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The P4 Foundation works directly with children and families impacted by childhood cancer to provide support hope and faith-filled encouragement as well as tips for health and wellness during treatment. Your donations to the P4 Foundation go directly to the families of P4 Kids whove been diagnosed with childhood cancer. All donations make a difference and go toward: Extensive treatment costs Gas groceries and utility bills Helping families afford fun activities Funeral and memorial expenses

What it reported doing in 2025

P4 Foundation positively impacted 487 children & their families during 2022 with direct donations to improve their financial lives in some manner and ease the financial burden and stress associated with the impact of childhood cancers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 20
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 31.6%; rating input score 32
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 16.4% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 31.6% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.