Ozark Swimming Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311012953
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Glen Carbon, IL, USA
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$121,151
Expenses
$152,115
Assets
$209,544
Liabilities
$7,461

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Nathan Stooke (President)
  • Mark Imig (Admin Vice-President)

People named in this filing

  • Nathan Stooke (President)
  • Mark Imig (Admin Vice-President)
  • Angie Dorsey (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ozark Swimming Inc. is committed to promoting competitive swimming and aquatic development by supporting athletes coaches and clubs across the region. We provide leadership oversight and resources to foster excellence safety and inclusivity in the sport at all levels.

What it reported doing in 2024

Athlete and Coach Development Competitive Swimming Support-Ozark Swimming Inc. promotes competitive swimming within the Local Swimming Committee LSC through athlete and coach development programs and member-club support. The organization sponsored championship meets and provided athlete travel assistance coach and official education awards and outreach initiatives to ensure access and safety in swimming. Over 2700 athletes 25 clubs and 380 non-athletes including coaches and officials are supported.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 65% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 64% for direct work, and 36% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 65.5%; rating input score 66
  • Program expense ratio: 52.9%; rating input score 53

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -25.6%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.38; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 23.1%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 65.5% of revenue deployed · 52.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $80K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.