Ozanam Hall of Queens Nursing Home Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 112167809
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Bayside, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7182247598
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $71,594,823
- Expenses
- $65,567,081
- Assets
- $64,084,049
- Liabilities
- $26,036,870
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MOTHER MARY ROSE HEERY (CHAIRPERSON/PRESIDENT)
- REVEREND JOSEPH FONTI (VICE CHAIR/VICE PRESIDENT)
- PATRICIA GATHERS (PRESIDENT / CEO / COO)
Highest reported compensation
- PATRICIA GATHERS (PRESIDENT / CEO / COO): $767,669 total reported compensation
- MADELEINE P SUPRENA (REGISTERED NURSE): $301,702 total reported compensation
- ANA TAGLE-HERNANDEZ (ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR): $201,545 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Ozanam hall of queens nursing home, inc. Mission is to provide holistic care to the aged and infirm in an atmosphere of christian understanding and faith. We hold in reverential esteem the sanctity of life although mental and/or physical limitations may exist, the life of every human being is considered sacred. Each one has, therefore a moral responsibility to respect and protect that basic right to life.
What it reported doing in 2024
Ozanam hall of queens nursing home, inc. (the home) consists of a 432-bed skilled nursing facility in queens, New York. The home is licensed by the state of New York and sponsored by the carmelite sisters for the aged and infirm and the roman catholic dioceses of brooklyn. It is primarily a rehabilitative and long-term health care facility for the aged and infirm.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.7%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 93.5%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $86.12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.4%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.98; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.41; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.6%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.7% of revenue deployed · 93.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $61.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $768K · 19 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $10.4M reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 25 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.