Oyster Creek Community VFD
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204610285
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Oyster Creek, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9792330243
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fire Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $97,678
- Expenses
- $106,652
- Assets
- $131,928
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Shawn Sanchez (President)
People named in this filing
- Brian Thompson (Fire Chief)
- Jesse Vital (Asst Chief)
- Shana Tidwell-Garza (Secy/Treas)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide fire fighting, emergency medical assistance, rescue operations, and fire prevention & awareness training for the communities served. To provide mutual aid to surrounding communities for fire fighting and rescue operations.
What it reported doing in 2022
Responded to calls consisting of structural fires, vehicle fires & motor vehicle accidents, EMS calls, wildland fires, rescues & assists, other fires (grass, plant, trash, boat), other hazards (power line, gas line rupture, gas leak, hazardous chemical), other assists as requested and false calls. The department is on-call 24/7/365.Fire calls = 50Mutual Aid calls = 45Landing Zone assists = 9Spills, & Motor Vehicle Accidents = 8All other calls = 35Total Calls Year 2022 = 147
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.3%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 78.1%; rating input score 78
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.2%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.24; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -12.9% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.3% of revenue deployed · 78.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $83K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2015 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.