Oxnard United Soccer Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364663382
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Oxnard, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8058908912
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $84,444
- Expenses
- $68,719
- Assets
- $45,828
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- FRANK MONTELONGO (President)
- KAREN BRATTON (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- FRANK MONTELONGO (President)
- KAREN BRATTON (Vice President)
- GABRIELA BASUA (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Oxnard United Soccer Club was formed for one purpose - to develop the individual talent and character of each youth soccer player to his or her fullest potential.By doing this, the best soccer teams in Oxnard (Ventura County) can be formed and play for Oxnard United Soccer Club.We promote the proper environment for our youth. We demand uniformity among our teams with a high caliber of play and more importantly, we expect fair play and good sportsmanship from our players and our teams.We believe, that by exposing talented players to a soccer environment of Dedication, Education and Enjoyment, every player can achieve their full soccer potential.The Oxnard community has a population of approximately 250,000 with 48 neighborhoods served by Oxnard United and other soccer clubs.
What it reported doing in 2021
2021 presented an opportunity year for physical activities for our youth. Tournament participations are costly. Oxnard united soccer club helps organize teams and participants. The association has participated in coast bracket teams, los angeles cup, copa cabana beach tournament along with the winter player pools. While masking was required through a small part of the season, the club was able to close the year with many awards and recognitions throughout southern California. There are over 190 registered athletes in the program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.4%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.6%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 63.9% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $69K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2012 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.