Overlake Hospital Auxiliaries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237297831
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Bellevue, WA, USA
- Phone
- 4256885000
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $40,985
- Expenses
- $36,189
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mary Mott (President)
- Patricia Ann Murphy (Vice President)
- J Micheal Marsh (President & CEO)
People named in this filing
- Mary Mott (President)
- Patricia Ann Murphy (Vice President)
- Lani Mobius (Trustee)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of Overlake Hospital Auxiliaries is to promote, support, and advance the wellbeing of Overlake Hospital Medical Center through a variety of ways including serving as goodwill ambassadors to the community, conducting fund-raising activities, maintaining membership strength, and providing service to the Hospital for the benefit of its patients and their families.
What it reported doing in 2020
Overlake Hospital Auxiliaries made grants in the amount of $10,230 to 11 Overlake Hospital Medical Center employees due to hardship.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 100% of its reported program spending for member benefits.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 26
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 25%; rating input score 25
- Program expense ratio: 28.3%; rating input score 28
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.7%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -17.7% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -25.1% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -26.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 25% of revenue deployed · 28.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2018 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 25/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 28/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.