Overflow
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352539141
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Toledo, OH, USA
- Phone
- 4192151100
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public, Society Benefit N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $117,252
- Expenses
- $105,746
- Assets
- $117,841
- Liabilities
- $32,762
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- George Williams (President)
- Sarah Williams (Vice President and Treasurer)
People named in this filing
- George Williams (President)
- Sarah Williams (Vice President and Treasurer)
- Amy Brooks (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To inspire, equip and support evangelism to disseminate through all means available for the Gospel of Jesus Christ and the Word of God and to teach the truths of the Christian Faith.
What it reported doing in 2025
The facilities and ministries of Overflow primarily provide a platform for relational ministry, which leads to tangible and non-tangible benefits such as friendships, emotional/spiritual support, prayer, training and discipleship.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55.2%; rating input score 55
- Program expense ratio: 61.3%; rating input score 61
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.8%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.11; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.6%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 35.7% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20.2% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 55.2% of revenue deployed · 61.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $65K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.