Over the Rainbow Franklin Cty Children's Advocacy Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
465011425
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Chambersburg, PA, USA
Phone
7175048491
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Child Abuse, Prevention

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$297,345
Expenses
$294,721
Assets
$685,705
Liabilities
$238,729

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DUSTIN HALUSKA (PRESIDENT)
  • DAVID RUSH (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • REBECCA VOSS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • REBECCA VOSS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $75,304 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization is committed to providing services and support to suspected child abuse victims and their families in a compassionate, child-friendly environment utilizing a multi-disciplinary approach with respect to the prevention, identification, investigation and treatment of child abuse while emphasizing the child as the first priority.

What it reported doing in 2024

Over the rainbow children's advocacy center (otr-cac) is a child centered organization which provides services and support to suspected child abuse victims and their families. Otr- cac is a neutral agency which works closely with a multidisciplinary investigative team (mdit) to provide a collaborative approach in the evaluation, investigation, treatment and intervention as related to child victims. Otr-cac enhances the multidisciplinary approach by providing a central location for joint interviews and information sharing among team members thus allowing for reduced trauma to the child victim and a higher probability of measurable outcomes for all disciplines. Members of the mdit consist of forensic interviewers, medical providers, mental health providers, family advocates, law enforcement, children and youth services and the district attorney's office, each of whom have specific roles within the framework of the collaborative approach. A forensic interview is a developmentally sensitive, fact gathering method of obtaining information regarding allegations of abuse or violence. This interview is conducted by a neutral professional utilizing research and practice-informed techniques as part of a larger investigative process. In 2019, the cac provided services to 315 children and their families. The cac also hired an intake coordinator/community educator to assist families and mdit members in the referral process and provide prevention programs to community members and schools. The objectives of the intake coordinator are to streamline the referral process for mdit members and families. The objectives of the community educator program are to spread awareness, increase the number of individuals who are informed about the issue of child abuse and provide children with body safety information.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 42
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 43.3%; rating input score 43
  • Program expense ratio: 41.5%; rating input score 41
  • Fundraising efficiency: $9.65 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.9%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.33; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 25.6%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.8% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 43.3% of revenue deployed · 41.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $122K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $75K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 41/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 38/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.