Ovarian Cancer Alliance of Florida Inc Aka Women's and Girls' Cancer Allian

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
061639604
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2015
Forms available
Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Longwood, FL, USA
Phone
4073390024
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$144,768
Expenses
$172,885
Assets
$95,851
Liabilities
$4,095

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANNE PEACH (Director, President)
  • GRACE GONZALEZ (Director, Vice President)
  • BONNIE DONIHI (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • ANNE PEACH (Director, President)
  • GRACE GONZALEZ (Director, Vice President)
  • MAUREEN BROCKMAN (Director, Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Raising awareness and providing education about gynecologic cancers for the purpose of saving women's and girls' lives.

What it reported doing in 2015

Reached over 3500 people at community events with education about gynecologic cancers to facilitate conversation about gynecologic health with medical providers; hosted community groups to support over 550 cancer patients and survivors.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.1%; rating input score 95
  • Program expense ratio: 79.7%; rating input score 80

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -19.4%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.55; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 20.2%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.1% of revenue deployed · 79.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $138K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.