Outreachers Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270206072
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2016
Forms available
Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2016, Form 990-N 2009
Location
Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Phone
7192262828
Rating
45
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Development
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,168
Expenses
$9,252
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • C Reed Cagle (President)
  • Doug Stimple (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • C Reed Cagle (President)
  • Doug Stimple (Vice President)
  • Adam Jardon (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Outreachers is a non-denominational Christian outreach organization focusing on the spiritual, educational, and economic growth of people around the world. Our goal is to lead people to a self-sufficient, sustainable, and spirit filled life that will provide a multi-generational blessing on their family and community.

What it reported doing in 2016

Casa Angelina-Guatemala: The Organization will provide financial support to build churches, houses, schools, medical clinics and feeding centers in various areas of the world. To date, the Organization is supporting projects in Guatemala and soon anticipates supporting projects in Mexico and the Philippines.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 96% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 21
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 19.7%; rating input score 20
  • Program expense ratio: 21.6%; rating input score 22

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -56.5% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -37.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -70% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 19.7% of revenue deployed · 21.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2012 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.