Outreach Nation Corp

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452973881
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA
Phone
9098258080
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Support N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$343,000
Expenses
$275,732
Assets
$106,631
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Khalida Khanum (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Khalida Khanum (CEO)
  • Tahir Ali (Treasurer)
  • Ronald Robinson (Secterary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to help under privileged families to be able to transform their lives by providing services and counselling that will improve, impact the lives of others and eliminate the day to day sufferings.

What it reported doing in 2025

We opened our doors to the needy and less fortunate people residing in counties of Los Angeles, Riverside and San Bernardino in November 2011. We have accomplished in this short span the ability to provide services to over 500 families per month on a bi-weekly basis. We have collected and distributed products from our generous donors for our local communities. The items such as Clothes, Shoes, Boots, Jackets, Various Food item, Soft drinks, Water and Juices and Community Service Programs. In addition we have been blessed to also give household products to needy families. Refrigerators, stoves, washers, dryers, couches, complete beds for children, Dishes, televisions, silverware and more, Ice packs and Medical Supplies and Medicine. We have been blessed the opportunity to provide Mothers a brunch in celebration of Motherhood, Mentorship for our youth and hundreds of toys for our children during the holiday season. Our new contract with the county who pays for the counseling services. we provide these services to in need families. According to this contract we provide the counseling to 10-15 clients per month. The type of services we provide are individua, couples and family counseling as well as classes for parenting, domestic violence, anger management as well as life skill classes. We have independent contractors and interns who provide these services. Our new contract with the county who pays for the counseling services. we provide these services to in need families. According to this contract we provide the counseling to 10-15 clients per month. The type of services we provide are individua, couples and family counseling as well as classes for parenting, domestic violence, anger management as well as life skill classes. We have independent contractors and interns who provide these services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 12
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.4%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19.6%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $276K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 13 of 14 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.