Outdoor Lab Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 200293537
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2008
- Location
- Wheat Ridge, CO, USA
- Phone
- 7204038241
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $837,584
- Expenses
- $759,657
- Assets
- $1,469,943
- Liabilities
- $12,939
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- BRYAN MARTIN (EXECUTIVE DI): $130,123 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To inspire community support for an advocate on behalf of jefferson county public schools outdoor lab program.
What it reported doing in 2024
Over the past year we served 35 middle schools, taught 260 core classes, and recruited 1,040 high school leaders. In total, we served over 4,200 students by connecting them - often for the first time - to the outdoors. In total, students hiked over 33,600 miles and be engaged in experiential learning over 16,800 program days. Moreover, we are proud of our achievements in the six following program areas and strategic initiatives: the tuition assistance program we ensure the fees to attend outdoor lab are as low or no cost to as many students as possible in the district. An inability to pay tuition should not be a barrier for children to have a transformative time in the outdoors. We delivered 175,000 in tuition assistance grants to 36 middle schools in fy 25. The intern program we provided 20,000 in stipends to support our interns in fy 25. Interns are the "boots on the ground", the "glue", the "point guards" of outdoor lab. They support teachers, organize classes, train high school leaders, and provide untold support to outdoor lab principals and site staff. The high school leader program - outdoor lab leans on the volunteer support of 1,040 high school students each year. They lead classes, move students through their learning centers, and serve as caring young adult mentors to our 6th graders. In total, they contributed over 88,400 hours of community service to outdoor lab and jeffco neighborhood schools. We supported high school leaders with 6,000 in scholarships for their stalwart service as outdoor lab leaders in fy25. The site support program the foundation works to ensure that nurses and AIDS have the outerwear and resources they need to keep every student safe, warm, dry, and feeling welcome on site. We also purchase materials and supplies for teachers to impart lessons in the field. Lastly, we paid over 25,000 for important maintenance and infrastructure improvements, so that our campuses remain attractive and engaging venues for learning. Gear library expansion we are always looking to fill the shelves of both sites with lightly-used or new gear and outerwear students need to stay warm, dry, and feeling safe while in the mountains and away from home. In fy 25 we garnered hundreds of coats, hats, gloves, boots, and other critical pieces of outerwear so that both campuses had a fully stocked gear library. In total, we gave 9,866 of in-kind outerwear to provide students with appropriate clothing for the elements.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 72% for direct work, and 28% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.9%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 81.5%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.48 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.3%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.94; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.1%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.9% of revenue deployed · 81.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $619K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $130K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 36/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.