Out Central Oregon
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 384072596
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Bend, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5152914680
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $89,278
- Expenses
- $60,646
- Assets
- $103,982
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEFANIE SIEBOLD (VICE PRESIDENT)
- LAUREN ROSE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- AJ HINOJOSA (SECRETARY)
- ANDREA WICKBERG (DIRECTOR)
- MEGAMO NESBIT (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Out central Oregon promotes inclusivity and visibility for lgbtq+ people and our allies by enabling and fostering community engagement within the social, cultural, and economic landscape of central Oregon. By developing and building partnerships with businesses, government agencies, and other organizations, we promote and support the well-being of the lgbtq+ community and our allies.
What it reported doing in 2024
Produced winter pridefest 2024 and supported numerous other arts, culture, and outdoor lgbtq+ organizations and their initiatives through paid promotion and social media outreach, and served as a hub of information (website, facebook, instagram) relating to lgbtq+ events in central Oregon. In 2024, we implemented a comprehensive dashboard and metric system to ensure equitable distribution of funds throughout the region. Additionally, we strive for our board to reflect the diversity of both the 2slgbtqia+ community and the various regional populations of central Oregon.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 69% for direct work, and 31% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51.6%; rating input score 52
- Program expense ratio: 75.9%; rating input score 76
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 32.1%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.71; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -40.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -24.1% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 51.6% of revenue deployed · 75.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $46K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.