Ourschoolsinc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
473093152
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Manchester, MA, USA
Phone
9789211674
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$215,606
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • SUSIE MILLER CORELLO (CHAIR)
  • KIM PERRON (TREASURER)
  • JORGE OCHOA (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of personal pathway program (p3) is to empower all students to pursue a life pathway without limits by providing them the skills to successfully plan for and navigate life after high school. No two pathways are the same. Every p3 student graduates with a unique plan for work or college.the p3 academic program has three key components: our unique pathways curriculum, a multi-tiered system of supports and a core academic curriculum taught through a personalized approach. The combination of these key components gives purpose to learning, meets each student's unique set of academic needs and allows each student to develop the habits of success needed throughout life.

What it reported doing in 2019

During the 2020 fiscal year, ourschools continued its support to turnaround the william peck middle school in holyoke Massachusetts.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 30
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 80.7%; rating input score 81

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -43.3% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -18.4% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $174K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2015 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.