Ourcalling Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 264430860
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2144448796
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Personal Social Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,716,444
- Expenses
- $6,962,931
- Assets
- $20,954,316
- Liabilities
- $536,507
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WAYNE WALKER (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- WAYNE WALKER (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $304,416 total reported compensation
- JULIANA WILLIAMS (CHIEF ADVANCE. OFFICER (AS OF 3/24)): $171,094 total reported compensation
- TORI THOMPSON (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $163,541 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of ourcalling is to lead people to christ and make disciples on the streets. With our unsheltered homeless neighbors, this means we focus on helping people walk with jesus and get off the streets. We care for our neighbors with dignity and intentionally connect them to the body of christ and the support they need to live in a community of integrity.
What it reported doing in 2024
Ourcalling operates a downtown outreach center where neighbors experiencing homelessness access meals, showers, laundry, bible studies, church services, mentoring, addiction recovery classes, and access to +15 partner agencies that provide medical care, mental healthcare, pharmaceutical services, veterans support, id services, and more. We also send out search and rescue (street outreach) teams to 3,534 locations annually. Our teams serve under bridges, behind liquor stores, and trek through the woods to visit homeless friends in their camps and throughout the city. We have created over 1,100 unique exit strategies to help individuals get off the streets and live in long-term communities of integrity. We help over 1,000 people annually exit homelessness.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 53
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 41.4%; rating input score 41
- Program expense ratio: 75.2%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.57 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 45.2%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.01; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 23% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 21.2% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.2% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 41.4% of revenue deployed · 75.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $304K · 12 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 47/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.