Ouray Mountain Trail Run Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261229845
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Ouray, CO, USA
Phone
9705191281
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,525
Expenses
$14,432
Assets
$11,306
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Lori Leo (CO-Race Director)
  • Erin Edd (Co-Race Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Ouray Mt. Trail Run supports the Ouray School to enable the students and teachers to experience opportunities by travel to Paris, Catalina Island, Moab Utah. We also support the Ouray Athletic by helping pay for the refs for BB due to Covid (no gate fees to pay for refs) and to purchase shoes, equipment for kids of need. We also support the Ouray Trail group to maintain the Ouray Trails.

What it reported doing in 2021

$5000 to Outdoor Education class to purchase Outdoor equipment (bikes, skiing, Rafting) for 10-15 kids $400 To HS Service Day for 20-230 kids for lunch while performing public service $1000 to Ouray HS Athletic Fund to assist paying for refs for HS BB and MS BB games $500 to Ouray AD to purchase shoes, equipment for kids in need $300 to Booster Club to purchase Shutterfly books for students $500 to Ouray Trail Group to maintain trails in Ouray $1000 to PATT to benefit teachers and students in Ouray school $1000 to Paris Clube for 10 students to go to Paris $750 to Ouray 8th graders to go to Catalina Island $500 to Ouray 6th graders to go to Denver CO $100 to Ouray 5th graders to rent cross country skis

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -15.2%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.