Our Neighbors Place Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352383155
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- River Falls, WI, USA
- Phone
- 7154269000
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Homeless Shelters
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $600,386
- Expenses
- $380,020
- Assets
- $1,730,633
- Liabilities
- $287,463
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Brian Manion (Vice President)
- Tanya Franta (President)
People named in this filing
- SHELLY SMITH (Director)
- Brian Manion (Vice President)
- Brock Raffaele (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide emergency service, homeless shelter, and food to those in need
What it reported doing in 2024
Transitional Housing and Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA): This program is designed tostabilize and rehouse families experiencing homelessness. This program features a 4 unit building (2two bedroom and 2 three bedroom units) where families can live for up to 2 years while they work onsecuring permanent housing. Families work with our Case Manager while they live in the building.Families contribute 30% of their income toward rent while they work toward the goal of findingpermanent housing. TBRA vouchers (through WestCAP) are accepted in the program as TBRAvouchers are only offered to households experiencing homelessness.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 42
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 6
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 35.1%; rating input score 35
- Program expense ratio: 57.7%; rating input score 58
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 36.7%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.55; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.2% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 35.1% of revenue deployed · 57.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 10 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $219K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 27 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 35/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule G fundraiser detail did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.