Our Native Healing Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
272196935
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Aurora, CO, USA
Phone
7205601450
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ethnic, Immigrant Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,220
Expenses
$3,786
Assets
$1,302
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Candace Fleming (Board Member)
  • Ruth Abeyta (Board Member)
  • Sidney Brown (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The business and purpose of Our Native Healing Center is to provide quality and culturally responsive behavioral health care services and information to American Indian and Alaska Native families impacted by mental health, substance abuse and historical trauma disorders.

What it reported doing in 2017

The program provided members of the Denver American Indian community with psychological services for mental health issues as well as psychological assessments. We assisted American Indian families with parenting problems and involvement with child welfare by providing mental health treatment, assistance with healthy parenting, and psychological assessment requested by Child Welfare Courts. Cultural education and advocacy was provided to assist families with county child welfare agencies, child welfare courts, other agencies and schools as required. This information was needed to assist with child safety, parental rights determinations and the provision of accommodations for students in the school system. The purpose is to help American Indian families remain intact and for children to be safe and successful at home, in the community and at school.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.3%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -66.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -26.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -28.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2011 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.