Our Mother's Home of Southwest Florida Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
650510103
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Fort Myers, FL, USA
Phone
2392674663
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Residential Care & Adult Day Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,538,119
Expenses
$1,154,947
Assets
$2,270,276
Liabilities
$907,651

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALICIA MILLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR UNTIL APRIL)
  • ANGELA RACKLY-MEADOWS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AS OF DECEMBER)
  • BETH JULIANO (PRESIDENT UNTIL JAN.)
  • MARIN ASHER VP UNTIL (JAN., THEN PRESIDENT)
  • MELISSA VOGT DIRECTOR UNTIL (OCT. THEN VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ALICIA MILLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR UNTIL APRIL): $39,762 total reported compensation
  • ANGELA RACKLY-MEADOWS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AS OF DECEMBER): $7,692 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide a safe, nurturing home for teenaged foster mothers and their babies and for human trafficking victims, where they will learn to love and respect themselves, their children and others. To facilitate the educational, emotional and spiritual development of the residents with the goal of becoming self-sufficient, nurturing mothers and moral members of the community. To provide support and followup to "graduates" of the program as they put into practice the self-knowledge, guidance and skills they have obtained while in residence. The support will include personal, educational and career counseling, health care, and referral advice.

What it reported doing in 2024

Through the mentored living program, our mother's home provides a nurturing environment where courageous young women receive the support, guidance, and resources they need to break the cycle of poverty and neglect for themselves and their babies. The case managers play a pivotal role in supporting our mother's home's mentored living program, ensuring that each young mother receives comprehensive and personalized assistance to thrive.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.5%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 75.1%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.89 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.9%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.97; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.4; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.5% of revenue deployed · 75.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $868K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $40K · 14 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 43/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.