Our Lady of Life Apartments
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431229749
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- St Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3149618000
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Supportive Housing for Older Adults
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,800,982
- Expenses
- $5,260,829
- Assets
- $12,523,598
- Liabilities
- $23,324,826
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRIS BAECHLE (CEO/ASSISTANT SECRETARY)
- JARED BRYSON (PRESIDENT, CATHOLIC CHARITIES)
- JERRY RUMPH (BOARD PRESIDENT)
- SR RENITA BRUMMER (BOARD VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRIS BAECHLE (CEO/ASSISTANT SECRETARY): $231,361 total reported compensation
- JARED BRYSON (PRESIDENT, CATHOLIC CHARITIES): $230,378 total reported compensation
- JOE JANSEN (CFO/COUNCIL MEMBER): $174,481 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate, caring presence.
What it reported doing in 2024
Operation of 207 unit senior apartment complex offering a continuum of care, one daily meal, as well as numerous social and health promotional activities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 89% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.6%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 84%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90.5%; rating input score 90; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.3%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.38; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.86; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.5%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.6% of revenue deployed · 84% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 21 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $231K · 22 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.