Our Lady of Fatima Villa Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 770536465
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Saratoga, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4086472760
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,562,887
- Expenses
- $1,243,944
- Assets
- $17,436,561
- Liabilities
- $2,932,148
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BELLA O MAHONEY (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
People named in this filing
- REV SCOTT WALLENFELSZ SDS (CHAIR AND TREASURER)
- BELLA O MAHONEY (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
- SR SUSAN SNYDER (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary objectives and purposes of the foundation are 1. To provide services to residents of the city of saratoga and county of santa clara including adults in need (including but not limited to seniors), persons with disabilities, families in need and caregivers. 2. To preserve the artistic and religious artifacts for the community, promote cultural activities in the community, and support civic life in the community; and 3. To provide a preferential option of its support and activities to those who are frail, elderly, or disabled, and facing challenges presented by their age and/or health conditions.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization serves to do the following: children in need of birth defect or burn reconstruction who suffer greatly not only from the physical disfigurement, but also from malnutrition, speech disorders, hearing impairment and other difficulties.educate and inspire families to build bright futures for youth and adults with disabilities. Services provided may include mental health counseling, emotional support and guidance, information on health conditions, and community resources.provide technology programs for seniors in nursing homes to better engage in activities of daily living.provide services to the elderly that include transportation, nutrition, fall risk reduction, companionship, physical and mental stimulation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 75% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 87
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.8%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 62.2%; rating input score 62
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.1%; rating input score 99; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 51.5%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 14.02; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.8% of revenue deployed · 62.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $773K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.