Our House of Portland Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
930986632
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2021
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Phone
5032340175
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospices

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,615,717
Expenses
$1,553,493
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARY RITA HURLEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARY RITA HURLEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $135,333 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Guided by compassion, collaboration and respect, our house provided Oregon and southwest Washington's only integrated continuum of health and housing services to people with HIV.

What it reported doing in 2021

Our house provides 24 hour specialized nursing care and services in a residential care facility for those with advanced HIV who require intensive care. In addition to HIV and related physical health issues, many residents also suffer from mental illness, substance use disorders and/or histories of houselessness. In the past six-month period a total of 22 residents and their families were served through the our house residential program.residents of our house are encouraged to attend activities provided by our staff and community volunteers. Prior to march 2020, these opportunities include swimming, bowling, bingo, creative writing, gardening, crafts and more. We also have outings to parks, museums, movies, the coast and special community events. In march 2020 when covid -19 hit our community and the governor imposed sanctions on long term care facilities, we had to re-arrange our activities. Until it is once again safe for our residents to be in the public for long periods of time, we have been getting creative with what we can do in the building to keep them enganged and active. We go for group walks/rides in the neighborhood and many of our residents will venture out on their own walks or wheelchair rides. Our therapeutic garden continues to be a place they can enjoy nature and the outdoors, while feeling safe at the same time. All residents, including those with visual and other physical impairments, are encouraged to spend time outdoors when possible. The work at our house continually evolves, depending on the nature of the ever changing HIV virus and the complexity of our residents. Much of our recent work is centered around addressing complex co-morbidities, as well as difficult behavioral and cognitive issues. Our continuing educational programs for staff and volunteers are centered around current issues of behavior, nutrition, diversity and other important topics.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 66% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 88.9%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.55 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.9%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.7%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88% of revenue deployed · 88.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $135K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.