Our House of Hope Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
260152349
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2007
Location
Libertyville, IL, USA
Phone
7735524673
Rating
46
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$150,647
Expenses
$134,972
Assets
$178,523
Liabilities
$275

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LISA M KRINNINGER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & PRESI)
  • JOAN E MILLER (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LISA M KRINNINGER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & PRESI)
  • JOAN E MILLER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAEL KRINNINGER (SECRETARY/TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our house of hope is an innovative prevention based animal welfare organization. Our concentration is on animal rescue, rehabilitation and rehoming. We lead through example, community involvement and education.we give a voice to our rescues and our public. During times of transition, we also provide support to our seniors, low income families, the disabled and our veterans. It is in this way that we give "hope" to the community in which we service and the rescues that may pass through our doors.our house of hope, inc is an il. 501(c)3 state licensed non profit animal welfare organization who specializes in the medical, behavioral and emotional rehabilitation of animals.

What it reported doing in 2025

The funds were used for health, medical care, and nourishment of our animals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.4%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.32; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -25.7% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.