Our Hospice House

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
993243572
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Belton, TX, USA
Phone
2542162020
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospices

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,056,565
Expenses
$517,447
Assets
$596,738
Liabilities
$2,755

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEFFREY BATES (PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
  • KEVIN DWYER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ANNIE MCCALL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANNIE MCCALL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $51,338 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of our hospice house is to provide around-the-clock family like, home care in a peaceful, compassionate environment where terminally ill residents can live and die with dignity, comfort, and grace while being cared for with love at no cost to those in need.

What it reported doing in 2025

Our hospice house has created a model for community-based homes that provide a comfortable and supportive environment for individuals and their families during the final days or weeks of life. Our vision is to create a warm and welcoming space that feels like home, with: a cozy living room and eating area for family gatheringsa fully equipped kitchen for shared mealsa serene outdoor area and back porch for quiet reflection and prayerthree private rooms with space for loved ones to staythese types of homes are often referred to as "comfort care homes," "homes for the dying, or "social model hospice homes." unlike traditional hospice care, which doesn't cover housing or 24/7 support, our community-based approach fills this critical gap.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 43.5%; rating input score 43
  • Program expense ratio: 88.5%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $75.79 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 51%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.15; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 73.4% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 164.7% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 43.5% of revenue deployed · 88.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $458K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $51K · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.