Our Harbor of Hope for Families

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
843818899
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Tyler, TX, USA
Phone
9038085394
Rating
58
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Parent Agencies

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$131,031
Expenses
$124,335
Assets
$59,601
Liabilities
$142

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LARHONDA HAMILTON (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • ANNA JOHNSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • SUZY WALKER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARLENE DICKSON (DIRECTOR)
  • LORIE MCCASLAND (OPERATIONS DIRECTOR)
  • LARHONDA HAMILTON (VICE-PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We cultivate communities of belonging so that no person has to navigate life alone.

What it reported doing in 2025

Warrior women: provided community where single moms could gather together for a time of learning, sharing, growing, etc. Classes and bible studies were offered. The in-person gatherings (shine nights) are offered monthly. Each session included dinner, childcare and opportunities for learning through guest speakers. We served an average of 20 moms and 28 kids each month.our online presence experienced notable growth in 2025, with our facebook community expanding to over 100 members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 37
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 36.4%; rating input score 36
  • Program expense ratio: 38.4%; rating input score 38

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.1%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 53.2%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -35.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 36.4% of revenue deployed · 38.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $48K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.