Our Hands His Heart Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
272776635
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Rowlett, TX, USA
Phone
2145350557
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$48,269
Expenses
$45,415
Assets
$4,054

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Richard Harris (President, Dir.)

People named in this filing

  • Richard Harris (President, Dir.)
  • Susan Crockett (Secretary, Dir.)
  • Craig Vaughn (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the organization is to provide support to low income individuals and to provide educational and recreational activities to school age kids from the community.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, we continued to help meet the needs of the underserved people of Southeast Dallas County. We did that by: A. Providing food and food services to families within the area. They would come to our location, and we would use food we had purchased in order to serve them not just food but food that is healthier than what they might receive at a normal food bank. Over the year we reached between 15 and 18 families.B. We helped to build a safe environment for families in our area by providing sporting events such as soccer and kickball. We had upwards of 100 people in our soccer program with around 30 in our kickball program for both adults and children.We use this time to help families spend time together. Each event is followed by some time for fellowship. That is normally by having a time to eat or snack together. This time allows parents to build community in a safe environment that is also a positive influence in the area.C. We support our children in the area by providing new shoes, school supplies, toiletry items, backpacks, lightly used clothes and some form of food for the household at our back-to-school event. This event is our largest one-day event in the year drawing hundreds of children and their parents. D. In December we take Santa into the 13 mobile home parks we support and hand out smiles and candy. But the real purpose is to hand out blankets to the children of the area. The mobile homes we support do not always have the best insulation and building materials. These blankets are seen for much of the year at all our events, as the families use them to support their needs within the home.E. This past year we increased our support for a group home in the area. We supported them with visits, fresh food, and short-term supplies as needed. The important part of this ministry was the visits. Our friends within these homes rarely receive outside visitors, thus making the visits critical to the mental wellbeing of those involved.Our basic ministry is to supply in whatever way we can the support needed by the people of southeast Dallas. They live in a sometimes-dangerous environment as well as food desert. Our goal is to provide the mental/spiritual and physical support needed to build strong families. Community is an important word to us, and we seek to build it in any way possible.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.1%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 89.4%; rating input score 89

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.9%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -16% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.1% of revenue deployed · 89.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $41K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.