Ota-dui School of Ok Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
923867324
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Skiatook, OK, USA
Phone
9186885863
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment

Reported finances

Revenue
$144,108
Expenses
$115,099
Assets
$26,146
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHRYSTAL PROBASCO (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CHRYSTAL PROBASCO (PRESIDENT)
  • MCKAYLA HARPER KLEREKOPER (SECRETARY/DIRECTOR)
  • JARED KLEREKOPER (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To reduce impaired driving

What it reported doing in 2025

Activities provide a process for participants to comply with court ordered mandate to facilitate the participants remediation processes for dui courts located in Oklahoma. Dui schools of Oklahoma provided alcohol and drug assessments, educational classes, and counseling sessions to individuals referred by courts, service Oklahoma and other community partners. These services helped participants meet reinstatement availability, introduced new curriculum material, collaborated with local treatment providers and resource centers, including tribal courts.as a alcohol and drug safety and a reduced likelihood of future offenses. The program continues to strengthen community safety and promote rehabilitation across Oklahoma.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.9%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.1%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 36.5%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 62.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 29.2% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 124.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $115K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.