Osceola Community Health Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
392029106
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Osceola, WI, USA
Phone
7152942111
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$171,378
Expenses
$107,624
Assets
$923,363
Liabilities
$41,343

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KELLY MACKEN-MARBLE (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • KELLY MACKEN-MARBLE (CEO): $408,134 total reported compensation
  • MISTY CHARLIER (CAO): $215,271 total reported compensation
  • TAMMY WALSH (CFO (THRU MAR 2024)): $111,105 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The goal of the osceola community health foundation is to build healthy communities by fostering charitable support for the osceola medical center and the health-related needs of the people in the upper st. Croix valley.

What it reported doing in 2024

Internal grant- we provided 2 grants to omc. One was for the purchase of equipment for prostate surgery. Because the equipment was not received until later in 2024, most surgeries using this equipment were not performed until 2025. However, 6 surgeries in 2024 were done more successfully as a result.the other grant was for space planning for the expansion project. This helped omc cover some costs for the consulting of space planning. We estimate 5 meetings were held and consultant drawings were completed that this grant helped support. Patient care fund- the foundation provides clothing and gas/food coupons for patients with emergent needs for any and all of these. We estimate 40 patients were helped through this program. Staff is able to grab clothing for patients of all ages as needed from a supply the foundation provides. Gas/food coupons are available in binders located throughout the facility and tracked via our quality improvement outcome system. 10 patients were supported with gas/food coupons in 2024. This portion of the program was not initiated until mid 2024. External community grants- we supported 2 community organizations which align with the mission of omc to improve the health and wellbeing of the people in the upper st. Croix valley. The first organization's mission is to provided family education and parenting skills for new parents in the rural areas of our market, including those who are non-english speaking. Their mission is to help improve safety and health in family's homes. They were able to double the number of families served to 28 and double the number of visits for these clients to 119. The next organization provides transitional housing for women after imprisonment for up to a year and is specifically for those who have recovered from substance abuse and need further support upon release to continue improving and restart life sober. This organization was able to help 16 women in 2024 to gain employment, driver's license, and access to children.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 58.6%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 87.3%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 83.5%; rating input score 83; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 37.2%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.58; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 72.4%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 58.6% of revenue deployed · 87.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $94K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $408K · 17 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 16 of 17 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.