Orvieto Musica
Legal name: Orvieto Musica Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133920243
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2008
- Location
- Lubbock, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9143299683
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $259,084
- Expenses
- $228,002
- Assets
- $71,106
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANCA VAN ASSENDELFT (PRESIDENT)
- ANDREW CLARKSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KIM WALKER (DIRECTOR): $8,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Orvieto Musica’s mission is to deliver Italy’s foremost chamber music festival, leadership summit, and transformational journeys—cultivating artistic excellence and cultural exchange that resonates globally. Through extraordinary performances, professional master classes, innovative leadership programs, and a vibrant community, we commission new works, launch the emerging artist, and unlock the courageous leader within.
What it reported doing in 2024
Orvieto musica program service description: during the reporting period, orvieto musica provided immersive music and performance education, music and leadership experiences to a diverse, international cohort. Key accomplishments include: serving approximately 156 clients (students and participants), with 114 performers featured on stage. Delivering 23 days of programming, including; 82 masterclasses, 90 one-on-one lessons, 22 dress rehearsals, 22 concerts, 20 daily warm-up sessions/ engaging audiences totaling an estimated 4,000 individuals across nine venues. Publishing 2 program-related publications. Orvieto musica aims to foster cultural immersion, artistic growth, and leadership in music through intensive performance preparation, a leadership summit and community engagement. Our long-term goal is to cultivate the next generation of musicians, arts leaders, audiences and influencers with both local and global impact. Demand for our program continues to grow, as
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 80% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 24
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.5%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 42.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 88% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 8 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $228K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $8K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.