Orphan Voice Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
611503075
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Lexington, KY, USA
Phone
8594944655
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$554,228
Expenses
$547,531
Assets
$266,720
Liabilities
$50,416

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANTHONY BREWER (PRESIDENT &)

Highest reported compensation

  • CINDY BREWER (VP & DIR. OF): $60,207 total reported compensation
  • ANTHONY BREWER (PRESIDENT &): $48,707 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To be empowered by the father so that orphans, the abused, and children with special needs, as well as their families, experience his belonging, safety, healing, and help.

What it reported doing in 2025

Anti-trafficking prevention and recovery from sexual abuse in the dark world of human trafficking, vietnam is a "source country." that is, girls and women mainly, but also young men, are smuggled from vietnam to other countries through lies or coercion. Upon arrival in other countries (80% to china but others to europe and north america), the victims are forced into sexual or labor bondage. In addition to technical trafficking, vietnamese girls are also sometimes sexually abused without the technical definition of trafficking being met. Orphan voice works to prevent sexual abuse and trafficking and to help bring restoration when it happens. It's more precious than gold anti-trafficking seminars are very popular with educators and local governments. Tens of thousands of public school students experienced the more precious than gold anti-trafficking seminars each year. Some hundreds of others experience the protective seminar in churches. Additionally, in phnom penh, cambodia, 31 girls who have been sexually abused by family members or neighbors and who have been removed from their homes by the cambodian government, are safely and nourishingly housed and cared for at a recovery center. Orphan voice partially funds this recovery center which is run by a local church. Number of abused girls safely housed in vietnam at hope house: 10 number trained youth/ reintegrated into society with good jobs (victory house and esther's house (vietnam and cambodia): 20 number of active court cases for child sexual abuse/ convictions (esther's house): 6

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 53
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 60.6%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 61.3%; rating input score 61
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.77 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 77.7%; rating input score 78; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.2%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.9%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 60.6% of revenue deployed · 61.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $336K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 23/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.