Oroville Youth Soccer Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942771667
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Oroville, CA, USA
Phone
5305321789
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$122,903
Expenses
$64,822
Assets
$143,204

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROB BARTH (President)
  • RICK WULBURN (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • ROB BARTH (President)
  • RICK WULBURN (Vice President)
  • FRANCINE MENDENHALL (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Oroville youth soccer club is committed to an atmosphere of teamwork, sportsmanship and respect while developing individual soccer skills and fostering attitudes of spirit, cooperation and responsibility within the youth of the greater oroville area through the team sport of soccer.

What it reported doing in 2022

The 2022-2023 soccer season, the oroville youth soccer club provided recreational soccer for over 903 kids in the oroville, paradise, and brownsville area, at an affordable rate. The individuals who oversee this organization is comprised of all volunteers from the community. Furthermore, oysc partnered with other local community organizations to include children from the paradise community because the campfire destroyed the town of paradise.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 56%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 47.3%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.21; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.9%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 56% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $69K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 21 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2012 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.