Oroville Rattlers Wrestling Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453415946
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Oroville, CA, USA
Phone
5306807233
Rating
49
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,604
Expenses
$17,993
Assets
$3,733
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELANA BAXTER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ELANA BAXTER (PRESIDENT)
  • KELLY SMITH (TREASURER)
  • KATIE MCCONNELL (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of oroville rattlers wrestling club is to assist in the growth and development of our youth. Wrestling stresses self discipline and physical conditioning, giving the your student athlete an opportunity to build slef confidence and control. Oroville rattlers wrestling club started in 2011 and consists of male and female k-ith grade students. The practice site and dual meet location is at nelson ave school and oroville high school. The club is organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes under section 501 (c)3 of the internal revenue code. Www.norcaljrhighwrestling.com

What it reported doing in 2024

The mission of oroville rattlers wrestling club is to provide competitive wrestling opportunities for our youth community at the elecmentary and junior high leveles. The oroville rattlers wrestling club started in 2011 and consists of male and femaile k-8th grade wrestlers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 24
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 24.5%; rating input score 25
  • Program expense ratio: 21.3%; rating input score 21

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -15.3%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.4% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 24.5% of revenue deployed · 21.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 25/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 21/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.