Oroville Hope Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 475315046
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2022
- Location
- Oroville, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5305388398
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $334,495
- Expenses
- $388,857
- Assets
- $1,521,662
- Liabilities
- $987,128
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Joshua Jamison (CEO)
People named in this filing
- Peter Gibson (Chairman Founding Board Member)
- Torrey Goodwin (Board Member)
- Marjorie Gibson (Secretary Founding Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To end poverty, both physical and spiritual, in the Oroville community.
What it reported doing in 2024
1. Provided lunch bags to the homeless and needy 4 days a week serving approximately 70 per day.2. Provided over 100 food boxes for families each month.3. Distributed approximately 80 homeless food bags monthly.4. Participated in the city work program through the City of Oroville using homeless clients to do various projects as requested by the City.5. Provided one-on-one jobs skills training and work connection with people who are ready to move on to employment.6. Coordinated veterans assistance with veterans resource center.7. Worked with the greater Oroville Area Homeless Coalition providing assistance for those on the verge of homelessness.8. Worked with Butte County Health Department to provide medical screening and vaccination clinics. 9. Provided ministry services on a daily and weekly basis.10. Designated as Butte Countys emergency management donation center to assist residents in the event of a disaster.11. Activated emergency distribution hub with Office of Emergency Management in response to Cemp Fire. Continue to provide services to Camp Fire survivors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 73% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 6
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.3%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.91; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.65; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.8% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $389K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.