Oroville Economic Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 812230109
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2022–2025
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location: Oroville, CA, USA
Rating: 61
Verdict: SUPPORTED
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Alliance/Advocacy

Reported finances

Revenue: $59,787
Expenses: $76,176
Assets: $4,729

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

Vincent Kurland (President)
Scott Nash (Vice President)

People named in this filing

Vincent Kurland (President)
Scott Nash (Vice President)
Sara Nolind (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Celebrate and educate the community in the historical and cultural relevance.

Operating model

Revenue model: Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 50
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 18
Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 53.7%; rating input score 54
Program expense ratio: 42.2%; rating input score 42

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: -27.4%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: -21% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 57.8% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: -55.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 53.7% of revenue deployed · 42.2% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $32K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
Schedules: 2 filed schedules
Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2025
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 42/100.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.