Orlando Union Rescue Mission Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 591035082
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Orlando, FL, USA
- Phone
- 4074224855
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Homeless Shelters
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,413,007
- Expenses
- $9,153,660
- Assets
- $17,790,974
- Liabilities
- $558,011
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- FRED CLAYTON (PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- FRED CLAYTON (PRESIDENT/CEO): $162,760 total reported compensation
- HENRY HERRERA (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $122,320 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To bring the hungry, hurting, and homeless to a new life, new goals, and a new future in christ.
What it reported doing in 2025
See schedule o for a complete description of all program service accomplishments.the orlando union rescue mission is a christian ministry that conducts long-term residential programs that equip its guests - the homeless men, women, and children who live at the mission - to escape homelessness permanently. In addition to the immediate needs of housing, food, and clothing, the mission provides the education, training, addiction recovery, and counseling those guests need so desperately. It offers all those services in an environment that fosters knowledge of and a personal relationship with jesus christ. The mission provides all goods and services to guests for free; they pay nothing for all essential living expenses while they are at the mission.the mission operates two residential facilities. The family home houses single women, single mothers with children, single fathers with children, and intact married couples with children. The number of guests living at the family home varies, depending on the composition of the families and the number of children. The family home has a maximum capacity of 194 guests, but at any time, the population of guests typically varies between 140 and 180.the second residential facility is project hope, where the misison serves 158 single, homeless men. The centerpiece of the mission's programs at both the family home and project hope is the discipleship program, in which the guests live at the mission for an extended period while they recognize why they are homeless and develop the habits and behaviors that will enable them to overcome homelessness for the rest of their lives. Project hope also includes an emergency overnight shelter that provides a safe, comfortable place for homeless men to sleep, eat, shower, and attend chapel without the long-term commitments the discipleship program entails. The emergency shelter not only takes forty-eight men off the streets each night, but it also serves as the primary recruiting tool for the mission's long-term program for men.the mission also includes a family life center, which houses the mission's preschool, the programs for school-age guests, and educational and training activities for adult guests. The early learning center (elc) is the mission's preschool for the youngest children of its family home guests. The elc cares for children from 6:30 a.m. To 8:30 p.m. Weekdays, is staffed by certified preschool teachers, and offers age-appropriate curricula for the mission's youngest guests. For school-age children, the mission provides a full range of after-school activities, including homework assistance, tutoring, specialized instruction in reading comprehension and memory training, physical activities, and social time.the mission operates an accredited high school, the career learning center (clc), for adult guests. The clc issues high-school diplomas, not ged certificates, and every adult who enters the mission without a diploma must get one. Adult guests also take courses on personal finance, parenting, time management, and other similar topics. Additionally, mission guests have tuition-free access to sixty-three vocational training certification programs through valencia college. Guests have used that opportunity to become certified in medical assistance, welding, cnc machining, electronic board assembly, and a wide range of other skills. The educational programs for adults, both inside the mission and through outside organizations, prepare guests to obtain employment that leads to productive, prosperous careers, which will sustain them financially and enable them to avoid a relapse into homelessness.because of the prevalence of substance abuse among the homeless, especially men, the mission conducts an active, successful addiction recovery program. It includes an internal component, conquering chemical dependency, which occurs on mission property, and mandatory participation in celebrate recovery, a public, faith-based program. All guests undergo dr
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 73% for direct work, and 27% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.4%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 72.3%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.47 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.4%; rating input score 97; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.8%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.94; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.1%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.4% of revenue deployed · 72.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $163K · 13 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $1.6M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 35 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.